Don’t you just love the ex-POTUS’ and disgruntled ex-employees like “W” and Gen Mattis putting in their unsolicited 2 cents on POTUS Trump’s performance? It is right in line with Mitt Romney’s embarrassing public speech against Trump in 2016 and more recently in Feb. Don’t these men have jobs or hobbies? “W’ is still mad that his daddy didn’t win re-election. Romney is still mad he didn’t get elected at all (to the POTUS), and Mattis is still mad over Trump’s withdrawal from Syria. So let’s focus on Mattis, who is the only one of the three I have an ounce of respect for. He knew when he took the job that Trump does not like US troops to be deployed and prefers other strategy to fight wars. It was no surprise that Trump wanted our troops pulled out asap…and Mattis should not have signed up for the job if he knew ahead that his Commander In Chief had a radically different philosophy than his. But he gladly took the job and relished the limelight and enjoyed the power…like all of these clowns do. Now, let’s see if Mattis is right about Trump dividing a country and threatening the Constitution……
Our country has been divided since the beginning of its history and likely will always be. It is why we have different political parties, it is what caused the Civil War, it is why the reaction to the Vietnam war was so polarized. We are free thinkers. Perhaps we have gotten more polarized over the decades. There has been a general degradation in the way people dress to go out in public, taking prayer and reflection out of public schools, allowing life in the womb to be aborted at will. This is no President’s fault. We were pretty divided under Obama and were considered racist if we didn’t vote for him, when for me at least–his race had nothing to do with it. I was actually happy to finally see some color in the office, but I had a fundamental difference in how I viewed America than he did. If Hillary R Clinton had been elected do you thing we would be more unified? With her calling Trump supporters ‘deplorable??? It is not division which is our problem…it is our allowing moral standards to decline. As far as the Constitution: the idea of martial law would be completely contrary to it and completely against my views. But when protests go to the point of violence and destruction of businesses and private property…..if the police cannot or will not stop it, what is left? To bring in the military. You could say that Trump might bring in the military to enforce the Constitutional rights of those who are trying to hang on to their property and citizen rights.
The police are part of the problem in a very big way and this is where I put a lot of the blame: there may well be a systemic race issue among white police officers. And there is an attempt to dummy down the police force into community relations personnel. This is not the role of police. The police need to treat everyone the same regardless of skin color and they need to respect and enforce the laws and ordinances where they work. And they need to be allowed to enforce those laws. And above all, they need to protect the rights of our citizens according to the Constitution. All laws and ordinances which are Constitutional must be upheld. And if Executive Orders are put in place which are unConstitutional, they need to protect the rights of the citizens they swore to protect and the Constitution they swore to defend. If the police did their job correctly and properly, many of our non-peaceful protest and rioting issues would disappear. The police do not need to be our pals and buddies. They need to be police and we need to respect them. Where they abuse their power and show blatant racism, we need to condemn and punish that..but not by violating the Constitutional rights of others.